BREATH 5 —Leaving the Ark

Published on February 5, 2026 at 11:57 AM

I had originally planned to cover the Nations Scattered and the Tower of Babel this week, as that’s how the outline broke it down. But there’s so much more in between that it looks like we have at least two weeks before we get there. Let’s slow things down a bit. These posts are already long and feeling pretty heavy. I think trying to plan out every detail ahead of time limits the space to let God lead and direct. So, with that in mind, shall we keep digging in together? 

“God did not end the flood because man had changed, but because mercy had spoken louder than destruction.”
— John Chrysostom

This week's song is called The Promise Remains. Imagine stepping out of the Ark the first time. Everything you once knew gone and to add to that you have no idea where you actually are. The air is different, the sky a clear blue like never seen before.  I had a lot of fun working on this one and is part of the reason the post is late I hope you enjoy. Just below in the drop down I pasted the Scripture for this week. It is based on WEB version. I only removed the numbers and put it into paragraphs.

Genesis 8: 15- 22

God spoke to Noah, saying,

“Go out of the ship, you, your wife, your sons, and your sons’ wives with you. Bring out with you every living thing that is with you of all flesh, including birds, livestock, and every creeping thing that creeps on the earth, that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful and multiply on the earth.”

Noah went out, with his sons, his wife, and his sons’ wives with him. Every animal, every creeping thing, every bird, and whatever moves on the earth, after their families, went out of the ship.

Noah built an altar to Yahweh, and took of every clean animal and of every clean bird, and offered burnt offerings on the altar.

Yahweh smelled the pleasant aroma. Yahweh said in his heart, “I will not again curse the ground any more for man’s sake, because the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth. Neither will I ever again strike every living thing, as I have done.

While the earth remains, seed time and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night will not cease.”

“Noah’s offering did not change God. It revealed that man could still respond.”— Irenaeus

What I find most interesting about this particular section of Scripture is trying to put myself in their shoes. 

Have you ever lived in a house where multiple families exist under a single roof? Just imagine with me for a moment. You are on a boat with a small handful of your immediate family. The boat is rocking but not because of the water but because Ham didn't feed the chicken and Japheth's wife isn't happy with Shem's wife. This animal decided to break out and try to jump off the boat. Ok, maybe that is a bit much I am certain that all humans and animals on that Ark were well behaved, thoughtful and considerate and never got on anyone's toes. 

Talk about "Cabin Fever" I can't imagine it was easy by any stretch.  Another thing I have noticed so far is there is no major dialogue from Noah's wife, sons or daughters in law. It won't be until Noah is drunk that we hear anything from any of them. Like I picture Noah on the Ark telling his wife and kids, " Aren't you glad you helped me get that wood? I told you so just rampant. Maybe that is why I find scripture so interesting. I sit and actually think how we could manage a similar event today. 

I am being serious here. Think about it. No! Stop! Really think for just a moment. If you are male.... How would you respond to God if you were Noah? How would you have responded to Noah if you were his son?  For you women I am sure his wife thought he was absolutely crazy until the first rain drop fell. Remember earlier until the flood rain didn't exist. They didn't know what rain was to begin with. Next walk into that boat. What are you doing all day? What does your family look like here? Are you fighting, bickering and causing strife or are you helpful, understanding and kind?  You are a male in the prime of your life where you would be building your life with your family. Your father comes telling you God is going to do this. What is your response. 

Why does it matter if we can put ourselves in the shoes of Bible Characters? Well. it reveals our character traits, behaviors and natural reactions. We are not called to be reactionary creatures. We are called to ACT not REACT. Scripture has given us the ability to see into most aspects of the human experience. I fully believe we will see the tribulation time and the church has added to scripture via copy paste method of grabbing verses and applying them recklessly to our lives. How did the early church survive? They held tight to truth. 

B — Background / Historical Context

Where are we in the story right now?
The flood has ended. The waters have receded. The ark has come to rest, and the ground has dried. Humanity has survived total collapse but has not yet reentered the world.

What has just ended before this Breath begins?
A prolonged period of judgment, isolation, and waiting. Noah and all living creatures have been confined inside the ark for over a year by most chronological reconstructions.

How long has life been confined inside the ark?
Long enough for routine, fear, dependence, and patience to be fully tested. This is not an emergency shelter. It became a the new way of life.

What does the world look like outside the ark at this moment?
Empty. Silent. Cleansed of prior civilizations. No cities, no structures, no visible human culture. Creation is present, but fragile and reset.

What structures are still missing?
There is still:

  • no nation

  • no written law

  • no priesthood

  • no temple

  • no sacrificial system given by command

Humanity is operating by memory, conscience, and relationship.

How is humanity expected to know how to respond to God here?
Through remembered relationship, not regulation. Noah acts from awareness, not instruction.

Who is involved in this moment?
God and Noah, with Noah representing all surviving humanity and life.

Who is present when God speaks again?
Only Noah is addressed directly.

Who has been silent until now?
Noah. There is no recorded speech from him throughout the flood narrative.

Why might silence matter after prolonged judgment?
It emphasizes submission, endurance, and listening. Noah survives without protest, negotiation, or recorded fear.

Why does this moment matter now?
Because reentry into the world requires permission. Survival alone does not authorize action.

Why does God speak before Noah leaves the ark?
To establish that restoration begins with divine initiative, not human impulse.

Why not allow Noah to decide when to exit on his own?
Because independence is part of what led to collapse. The narrative reinforces dependence at the threshold of renewal.

R — Role / Literary Function

What kind of text is this?
Narrative transition.

Is this law, commandment, or regulation?
No. There are instructions, but they are situational, not codified law.

Is this covenant language yet, or something earlier?
Earlier. This sets the emotional and relational groundwork for covenant, which comes next.

What is the function of this Breath in the story?
It marks the movement from survival to life resumed.

Does this passage explain the flood, or move the story forward?
It moves the story forward. The flood itself is not re-explained or justified here.

Is this a conclusion, a transition, or a beginning?
A transition that functions like a new beginning.

Is this a macro or micro Breath?
Micro in size, macro in consequence.

Why is such a small section given its own space?
Because thresholds matter more than duration. Crossing from judgment into life is a defining moment.

What does this Breath not try to do?

  • It does not explain evil

  • It does not defend God

  • It does not praise Noah

  • It does not declare the world “fixed”

E — Entities / Speakers & Listeners

Who speaks in this Breath?
God speaks.

Who initiates the conversation?
God.

Who gives permission, instruction, or blessing?
God grants permission to leave and acknowledges Noah’s response.

Who listens?
Noah.

Who hears God’s words directly?
Noah alone.

Who responds without speaking?
Noah responds through action.

What relationships are present?
God relates to Noah as:

  • a steward of life

  • a partner in continuation

  • a witness to restraint

How is God relating to Noah now compared to before the flood?
Less warning, more allowance. The tone shifts from impending judgment to committed restraint.

How is Noah positioned?
As a faithful responder, not a hero. He is not elevated above humanity—he carries it forward.

Who is noticeably absent?
Any opposing human voice.

Why might the absence of dialogue matter?
It reinforces unity between divine instruction and human response. There is no debate left.

A — Action / Sequence

What is the first action taken?
God speaks.

Does movement begin with God or humanity?
With God.

Why is that order important?
It establishes authority and continuity. Creation does not restart itself.

What actions follow leaving the ark?
Noah builds an altar and offers an offering.

What does Noah do first when stepping onto dry ground?
He worships.

Is it practical, emotional, or relational?
Relational. The action addresses God before addressing survival needs.

What response does God give?
God accepts the offering and commits internally to restraint.

Does God respond to words, actions, or intent?
Intent expressed through action.

Is this response immediate or reflective?
Reflective. God’s response is inward and forward-looking.

What changes because of this sequence?
God declares He will not again destroy all living creatures because of human inclination.

What is now different between God and creation?
God limits His own future response.

What has not changed at all?
Human inclination toward brokenness.

T — Themes / Motifs (Literary Only)

What patterns repeat from earlier Breaths?

  • God speaks → humanity responds

  • Order emerges from chaos

  • Boundaries are reestablished

Do we see echoes of creation language?
Yes. Dry ground, blessing, life continuing.

Do we see echoes of rest or boundary?
Yes. The flood ends. Motion slows. God pauses judgment.

What new motifs appear here?

  • Voluntary sacrifice

  • Divine self-restraint

  • Life permitted without cure

Is sacrifice new in this narrative?
Yes. It appears without instruction.

Is divine “response” framed differently than before?
Yes. God responds with restraint, not escalation.

What contrasts stand out?

  • Judgment vs. restraint

  • Destruction vs. preservation

  • Silence vs. renewed speech

How is God portrayed?
Intentional, resolved, near.

 

H — Holistic Arc / Narrative Connection

How does this Breath connect backward?
It resolves the immediate threat of total destruction.

What promises are implied?
That creation will continue despite humanity’s condition.

How does it point forward?
It prepares for covenant language and structured life.

What groundwork does this lay for the next Breath?
The allowance of life, not its healing.

How does this prepare for life outside the ark?
It establishes that survival does not equal restoration.

What long-term narrative thread begins here?
Divine restraint in the face of human failure.

How does God relate to human violence going forward?
By limitation, not eradication.

What is restrained—but not removed?
Human inclination toward violence.

Why does the story continue instead of ending here?
Because the problem persists.

E — Examine / Notes for Memory

What stands out as unusual?
God’s commitment is internal, not publicly sworn.

Why does God commit internally rather than publicly?
The focus is on divine resolve, not human assurance.

Why is the offering accepted without instruction?
It reflects remembered relationship, not commanded ritual.

What details slow the story down?
The sequence of speaking, leaving, building, offering.

Why might those details matter later?
They establish a pattern for worship before law.

What assumptions should be resisted?
That this is a happy ending or moral victory.

Is the world healed?
No.

What should be remembered for future Breaths?

  • God restrains Himself

  • Humanity remains unchanged

  • Life is permitted, not perfected

“The ark preserved bodies; obedience preserved the future.”  
Augustine of Hippo

“Yatsa” (יָצָא) — to go out, to be released

Context: God tells Noah to go out of the ark.
This is not escape language. It is permission language.

Early meaning:

  • Implies release under authority

  • Movement that follows command, not initiative

  • Used later for Israel leaving Egypt—always after God speaks

Early church reading:
Leaving the ark was understood as obedience completing judgment, not freedom from consequence.

“Mizbeach” (מִזְבֵּחַ) — altar

Context: Noah builds an altar without being commanded.

Key insight:
An altar in early Hebrew thought is not a ritual stage—it is a meeting point.
There is no priesthood yet. No law. No system.

Early church emphasis:
This is response worship, not institutional worship.

“Re’ach nichoach” (רֵיחַ נִיחֹחַ) — pleasing aroma

Often mistranslated sentimentally.

Hebrew sense:

  • Not about smell

  • Indicates acceptance, settling, rest

  • The same phrase used later for sacrifices God accepts—not because of blood, but because of alignment

Early church teaching:
God is not appeased by death; He is moved by obedience that aligns creation again.

“Lev” (לֵב) — heart, inner orientation

God speaks in His heart that He will restrain judgment.

This matters:

  • God does not announce this to Noah yet

  • Covenant restraint begins internally, not politically or publicly

Early church view:
This shows divine self-limitation, not divine weakness.

How the Early Church Taught This Passage

The early church did not teach this text as:

  • a children’s story

  • a morality tale

  • proof that God “won”

Instead, they taught it as:

1. Judgment completed, not reversed

The flood ends because its purpose is complete—not because humanity improved.

2. Worship before structure

Noah worships before law, covenant, or nation.
This was used to teach that true worship predates institutions.

3. God restrains Himself

This passage was central to early teaching on divine patience.
God chooses limitation in order to preserve life.


What Is Often Misunderstood or Misrepresented Today

Misunderstanding 1: “The flood fixed the problem”

Text says otherwise.
God explicitly acknowledges that the human heart remains inclined toward harm.

The flood restrains, it does not heal.


Misunderstanding 2: “God accepts sacrifice because He needs blood”

Early church teaching rejected this.
They taught:

  • God accepts obedient response

  • The offering reveals Noah’s posture, not God’s appetite


Misunderstanding 3: “This is a happy ending”

It is not.
It is a sobering continuation.

The story continues because the core problem remains.


How Teaching Shifted in the Last 200 Years (Post-Darby / Seminary Era)

Before (Early Church to Reformation):

  • Focus on obedience, restraint, continuity

  • God portrayed as actively limiting Himself

  • Humanity seen as unchanged but preserved

After Darby & modern systems:

  • Shift toward dispensational compartments

  • Flood reframed as a closed chapter instead of a pattern

  • Emphasis placed on future escape, not present restraint

  • Obedience softened into belief-only categories

Result:
This passage became:

  • symbolic instead of formative

  • historical instead of instructional

  • disconnected from daily life

What “dispensational compartments” means (in simple terms)

Dispensationalism is a way of reading the Bible that divides history into separate eras (dispensations) where God supposedly relates to humanity in fundamentally different ways.

Instead of seeing Scripture as one continuous story with patterns, it treats it like a series of sealed rooms.

Think:

“That applied then — this applies now — that belongs to Israel — this belongs to the Church — that was before the Law — this is after grace.”

Each era is handled almost independently.


What this looks like in practice

Under a dispensational framework:

  • The flood is placed in a “pre-law dispensation”

  • The law is placed in a different compartment

  • The church is placed in another

  • The end times are treated as a final, separate phase

So instead of asking:

What pattern is God establishing that continues?

The question becomes:

Which category does this belong to — and does it still apply?


How this affects Genesis 8:15–22 specifically

Early Church Reading

The early church read the flood as a pattern:

  • Human violence → divine grief

  • Judgment → restraint

  • Obedience → preservation

  • Mercy → continued history

This pattern was seen again in:

  • Israel

  • Exile

  • Christ

  • The Church

  • Martyrdom

Same God. Same posture. Same tension.


Dispensational Reading (modern shift)

Genesis 8 becomes:

  • “That was for that time”

  • “God handled things differently back then”

  • “This doesn’t tell us how God acts now”

So the flood becomes:

  • a closed historical event

  • a curiosity

  • a children’s story

  • or a prophecy puzzle

Instead of a living warning and restraint model.


Why this shift happened (historically)

Before the 1800s:

  • Scripture was read cyclically

  • Events were understood as echoing forward

  • Genesis shaped how later texts were interpreted

After Darby (1800s):

  • Scripture was systematized

  • Timelines replaced patterns

  • Charts replaced narrative flow

  • Theology became defensive and predictive

The Bible stopped being a story we live inside
and became a map we analyze from the outside.


The danger of compartmentalizing Scripture

When texts are sealed off into dispensations:

  • Warnings lose urgency
  • Patterns lose continuity
  • God appears inconsistent
  • Obedience becomes optional
  • Judgment feels distant
  • Mercy becomes abstract

Genesis 8 no longer says:

“This is how God restrains violence.”

It says:

“This is how God acted back then.”

That’s a massive shift.


Why This Matters Now

The early church read this text and heard:

Life is allowed to continue, not because humanity deserves it, but because God chooses restraint.

Modern readers often hear:

Everything is fine now.

The text does not say that. No God will not destroy the world with water again. But the earth will be "recreated" in a sense when the NEW HEAVEN and the New EARTH appear. 


What did you find the most interesting in this part of Scripture? 

What things did God reveal to you this week? Hop in the discussion below 

Add comment

Comments

There are no comments yet.